🔗 Share this article

Families whose relatives laid to rest in resting places at risk from shoreline retreat argue that a lack of decision on how best to address the problem is causing them unnecessary distress concerning the eternal homes of their loved ones.

A Looming Danger to Ancient Churchyards

The council have singled out three burial grounds in the communities of Happisburgh, Trimingham, and Mundesley as being in danger of being swallowed by the sea in the coming decades.

A recent report on the situation sets out a series of options, from taking no action to exhuming remains and reburying them in more secure sites. Authorities maintain it is for the community to decide how to proceed.

“Right now we’re in a state of uncertainty. It causes me distress. They intended this to be their last home, but it won't be because of the encroaching sea.”

Estimates suggest at least part of one graveyard could be claimed by the sea in the next 80 years, but some residents worry it will happen much sooner. “In my view it’s got less than 20 years, if you look at what’s occurred in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.

Troubled by the Past

A local business owner remembered a childhood visit to the neighbouring settlement of Eccles, which has almost entirely vanished into the sea, including its church and graveyard.

“You could see people’s bones,” she said. “Some have this romantic idea that the deceased will just get carried away to the ocean. They won’t. People will collect remains as mementos and go grave robbing looking for treasures. That is completely disrespectful.”

“I fear that the same thing that happened at Eccles will happen at Happisburgh and there’ll be skeletons on the shore. I’d be disgusted by that.”

A Paratrooper's Grave in Peril

Along the shoreline is situated the burial plot of a ex-soldier who died while working abroad. His mother said she could not sleep after learning her son’s final plot might one day be relocated.

“It truly trouble me to think this won’t be his lasting resting place,” she said. “To our family it’s an significant place to go.”

She believes, new burials should stop but says it is too soon to disturb existing graves. “My preference for now is to do nothing and closely monitor, but an early decision needs to be made when a tipping point has been attained.”

Seeking Solutions and Clarity

The lack of consensus over the timing and method to tackle the problem has left grieving relatives feeling exasperated and worried.

Some are calling for more coastal protections to slow the inevitable erosion and to permit burials to proceed for now. Different voices contend the time for relocation is drawing near.

“The situation is very emotive,” a family member stated. “The council’s report was thorough, but now there’s uncertainty about how it is implemented. And all parties is avoiding responsibility over who is accountable.”

A coastal manager said the burial sites were owned and managed of the church authorities. “In the end it is down to them to decide the direction to take. Our role is here to help support them through that journey with communities.”

He added there was ample time to weigh all the choices. “This concerns decades before it starts to be lost.”

“There is no unified opinion on what should happen yet. It requires good community discussions to discover the right answers for each community.”

The prospect of losing the churches and graveyards was labeled one of “profound sadness for the local community,” but faith leaders also spoke of a doctrine in life after death, offering a spiritual perspective on the temporal disappearance of sacred ground.